To simplify the expression \(-15 + 45(15e - 10) - 10e\), we will follow these steps:
-
Distribute \(45\) across the terms inside the parentheses:
\[
45(15e) = 675e,
\]
\[
45(-10) = -450,
\]
so,
\[
45(15e - 10) = 675e - 450.
\]
-
Substituting back into the expression gives us:
\[
-15 + (675e - 450) - 10e.
\]
-
Combine the terms:
- First, combine the \(e\) terms:
\[
675e - 10e = 665e.
\]
- Now combine the constant terms:
\[
-15 - 450 = -465.
\]
-
Putting it all together:
The expression now reads:
\[
665e - 465.
\]
However, we need to check for any specific forms mentioned in your options or simplify further if possible. The current expression does not match any of the provided options directly.
It seems we should consider the final simplified form based on your options. Here’s what you might have been looking for if we consider the process carefully:
-
Start from:
\[
-15 + 675e - 450 - 10e.
\]
-
Combine:
\[
-15 - 450 = -465,
\]
and,
\[
675e - 10e = 665e.
\]
Thus, the correctly simplified form is:
\[
665e - 465.
\]
Since the final expression does not appear to match any of the provided options as is, let’s check if it can be reduced to a possibly simplistic form, or if there might be a mistake in provided options.
Your options hint at simpler combinations, possibly mis-typed or misunderstood.
None of the options provided appears to match this standard result directly.
If needed to find equivalent forms via factoring or division potentially involving common values or different scenario handling, please review, or potentially recheck the expression or leakage in option formats or asked specifics to arrive at what might fit those. However, based solely on standard distribution and simplification, none match directly.
Please let me know if this clarifies, or provides guides forward!