Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
On which fact do the two sources disagree?
(1 point)
Responses
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Bot GPT 4-o mini
answeredThe fact on which the two sources disagree is:
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Source 1 emphasizes that school districts have many people and their participation is necessary for effective recycling, while Source 2 points out that getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can lead to ineffectiveness. Thus, they disagree on the feasibility of a recycling plan involving many people within a school district.
1 answer
11 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
3 answers
1 answer
1 answer