Let's break down the questions one by one.
Question 1
A) Define the variables:
- Let \( x \) be the number of board books.
- Let \( y \) be the number of soft cover books.
The cost relationship can be expressed as: \[ 1.5x + 0.5y = 20 \]
B) To check if Santiago bought 10 board books and 5 soft cover books:
- Substitute \( x = 10 \) and \( y = 5 \) into the equation: \[ 1.5(10) + 0.5(5) = 15 + 2.5 = 17.5 \] Since \( 17.5 \neq 20 \), it is not possible for him to have bought 10 board books and 5 soft cover books.
C) To graph the equation:
- Rearranging the equation: \[ 0.5y = 20 - 1.5x \implies y = 40 - 3x \]
- Identify x-intercept (when \( y=0 \)): \( x = \frac{40}{3} \approx 13.33 \)
- Identify y-intercept (when \( x=0 \)): \( y = 40 \)
D) Constraints of the situation:
- \( x \geq 0 \) (cannot buy negative books)
- \( y \geq 0 \) (cannot buy negative books)
- Since he cannot spend more than $20, the equation reflects that as well.
E) Viable solutions:
- The graph will show a line with the positive quadrant below it, where the solutions must satisfy the non-negativity constraints.
F) If Santiago bought 34 books: \[ x + y = 34 \] We have the system:
- \( 1.5x + 0.5y = 20 \)
- \( x + y = 34 \)
Substituting \( y = 34 - x \) into the first equation gives: \[ 1.5x + 0.5(34 - x) = 20 \] Solving for \( x \): \[ 1.5x + 17 - 0.5x = 20 \implies x = 6 \] Using \( x + y = 34 \): \[ 6 + y = 34 \implies y = 28 \] Thus, 6 board books and 28 soft cover books.
Question 2
A) Define the variables:
- Let \( c \) be the number of children.
- Let \( a \) be the number of adults.
The total cost inequality: \[ 10.50c + 5.50a + 150 \leq 300 \]
B) To check 10 children and 5 adults: \[ 10.50(10) + 5.50(5) + 150 = 105 + 27.5 + 150 = 282.5 \] Since \( 282.5 \leq 300 \), it is possible.
C) Graphing the inequality:
- Rearrange to get: \[ 10.50c + 5.50a \leq 150 \]
D) Constraints of the situation:
- \( c \geq 1 \) (at least one child)
- \( a \geq 1 \) (at least one adult)
- Spending limit of $300.
E) Viable solutions will be shaded below the line on the graph, constrained to positive \( c \) and \( a \).
F) Recommendation for invitations will depend on finding a reasonable balance while keeping below the budget and satisfying the minimum count constraints.
Question 3
A) Determine if \( (1,6) \) is a solution: \[ -x + y = 5 \implies -1 + 6 = 5 \quad \text{(True)} \] Substituting into the second equation: \[ y = (x - 3)^2 + 2 \implies 6 = (1 - 3)^2 + 2 \implies 6 = 4 + 2 \quad \text{(True)} \] Thus, \( (1,6) \) is a solution.
B) To solve using substitution: Setting \( y = (x - 3)^2 + 2 \):
- Substitute in \(-x + y = 5\), \[ -x + (x - 3)^2 + 2 = 5 \] Rearranged gives you a polynomial to solve.
C) Graphing the equations can be done, observing where they intersect gives the solution.
D) For a linear and quadratic equation, they could intersect once, twice, or not at all, indicating finite solutions, so infinite solutions are not possible.
Question 4
A) Checking if \( (0,3) \) is a solution: For the first equation: \[ \frac{1}{3}(0) + 3 = 3 \quad \text{(True)} \] For the second equation: \[ 2(3) = -\frac{2}{3}(0) + 10 \quad \text{(True)} \] So \( (0,3) \) is a solution.
B) Using elimination to solve:
- Multiply the first equation to eliminate fractions.
- Combine equations to solve for \(x\) or \(y\).
C) Systems of linear equations can be parallel (no solution), intersect in a point (one solution), or be the same line (infinitely many solutions), which can be analyzed via coefficients.
Question 5
A) Example system:
- \( y \geq 2x + 1 \)
- \( y < -x + 4 \)
B) A point (for example, (0,3)) is tested by substituting into both inequalities. If the point satisfies both, it is a solution.
C) The graph would show shaded regions indicating solutions, where the two areas overlap.
D) A system can have no solution if lines are parallel, showing distinct, non-intersecting paths on a graph.
These are the structured answers for the questions you provided based on the given scenarios in mathematics particularly associated with linear equations and inequalities. If you still need further breakdown, just ask!