Asked by I_EAT_EVERYDAY
Use the tables to create scatterplots and determine which scatterplot shows a linear association.
options:
A).
x 5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 800 700 350 450 500 1000 900 250 400 750
B).
x 5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 550 800 350 450 700 1000 900 250 400 750
C).
x5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 550 800 250 500 500 400 650 150 400 750
D).
x5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y550 800 250 300 700 1000 650 300 100 700
options:
A).
x 5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 800 700 350 450 500 1000 900 250 400 750
B).
x 5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 550 800 350 450 700 1000 900 250 400 750
C).
x5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y 550 800 250 500 500 400 650 150 400 750
D).
x5 8 2 4 6 12 10 1 3 7
y550 800 250 300 700 1000 650 300 100 700
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which scatterplot shows a linear association, we need to evaluate the relationship between the x and y values in each table.
**A)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 800, 700, 350, 450, 500, 1000, 900, 250, 400, 750
```
This data shows a more scattered pattern without a clear linear trend.
---
**B)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 350, 450, 700, 1000, 900, 250, 400, 750
```
This also shows a scattered distribution, especially around low x values.
---
**C)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 250, 500, 500, 400, 650, 150, 400, 750
```
The y values vary greatly with no clear linear relationship.
---
**D)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 250, 300, 700, 1000, 650, 300, 100, 700
```
Similar to the other datasets, but it appears there may be a slight upward trend.
---
After evaluating each table, while none of the datasets clearly confirms a strong linear association, **option D** seems to show a bit more consistency with a slight positive trend when plotted against x, compared to the others.
### Conclusion:
**Option D** would likely be the best candidate for showing a linear association among the datasets provided, though it is still not a perfect linearity. Graphing these datasets on a scatter plot would provide a clearer visual representation of the relationships.
**A)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 800, 700, 350, 450, 500, 1000, 900, 250, 400, 750
```
This data shows a more scattered pattern without a clear linear trend.
---
**B)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 350, 450, 700, 1000, 900, 250, 400, 750
```
This also shows a scattered distribution, especially around low x values.
---
**C)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 250, 500, 500, 400, 650, 150, 400, 750
```
The y values vary greatly with no clear linear relationship.
---
**D)**
```
x: 5, 8, 2, 4, 6, 12, 10, 1, 3, 7
y: 550, 800, 250, 300, 700, 1000, 650, 300, 100, 700
```
Similar to the other datasets, but it appears there may be a slight upward trend.
---
After evaluating each table, while none of the datasets clearly confirms a strong linear association, **option D** seems to show a bit more consistency with a slight positive trend when plotted against x, compared to the others.
### Conclusion:
**Option D** would likely be the best candidate for showing a linear association among the datasets provided, though it is still not a perfect linearity. Graphing these datasets on a scatter plot would provide a clearer visual representation of the relationships.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!