Which of the following were true of the relationship between governors and colonial assemblies by 1750-1760?

By 1750-1760, the relationship between governors and colonial assemblies in the American colonies was characterized by several key dynamics. Here's an analysis of the statements you provided:

1. The assemblies were content to follow the royal decrees without question.

   • False. Many colonial assemblies frequently challenged royal authority and were often not content to follow decrees without question.

2. The assemblies believed the colonists had a right to representation under their royal charters.

   • True. Colonial assemblies asserted that they had a right to representation and self-governance, which stemmed from their colonial charters.

3. The assemblies were growing weaker and less effective.

   • False. In many colonies, assemblies were becoming stronger and more assertive in their authority, especially as they gained more experience.

4. The governor frequently could not control the assembly.

   • True. Governors often faced difficulties in managing assemblies, especially as they became bolder and more confident in their assertion of power.

5. The assemblies' support came from England.

   • False. While colonial assemblies were influenced by English political thought, their support primarily came from the local colonists, as they represented local interests.

6. The assemblies had gained experience and confidence.

   • True. By this time, many colonial assemblies had developed significant experience in governance and were increasingly assertive in their legislative roles.

7. The governor had strong local support.

   • False. Governors often lacked strong local support, especially when their interests conflicted with those of the assembly or the colonists.

In summary, statements 2, 4, and 6 are true, whereas statements 1, 3, 5, and 7 are false regarding the relationship between governors and colonial assemblies by 1750-1760.