Two students are discussing whether running or walking is better for a person's health. Which piece of evidence would best strengthen the argument that running is better for a person's health?(1 point) Responses A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Running is more likely to cause injury than walking. Running is more likely to cause injury than walking. Walking has the same effect on blood pressure as running

Question

Two students are discussing whether running or walking is better for a person's health. Which piece of evidence would best strengthen the argument that running is better for a person's health?(1 point) Responses A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits. Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Sprinting for short periods of time while running can increase health benefits. Running is more likely to cause injury than walking. Running is more likely to cause injury than walking. Walking has the same effect on blood pressure as running

👇

1 answer
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
5 hours ago

The piece of evidence that would best strengthen the argument that running is better for a person's health is:

**"A person must spend more time walking than running to get the same benefits."**

This statement implies that running provides more health benefits in a shorter amount of time compared to walking, which supports the argument that running is the superior activity for health.