To determine if the graph uses a reasonable scale for Lina's dog-walking charges, we need to analyze the cost structure:
Lina charges a one-time fee of $5 and $10 per hour. This means the total cost can be represented by the formula:
\[ \text{Total Cost} = 5 + 10h \]
Where \( h \) is the number of hours walked.
Now let's consider the scale of the coordinate plane provided:
- The x-axis goes from 0 to 4. This could represent the number of hours (0 to 4 hours).
- The y-axis goes from 0 to 12, which would represent total cost (from $0 to $12).
Now let's calculate the total cost for different hours walked:
- If \( h = 0 \): Total Cost = \( 5 + 10(0) = 5 \)
- If \( h = 1 \): Total Cost = \( 5 + 10(1) = 15 \)
- If \( h = 2 \): Total Cost = \( 5 + 10(2) = 25 \)
- If \( h = 3 \): Total Cost = \( 5 + 10(3) = 35 \)
- If \( h = 4 \): Total Cost = \( 5 + 10(4) = 45 \)
Looking at the calculations:
- The scale on the y-axis (0 to 12) is not sufficient to capture the total costs of appointments for even 1 hour of dog walking, as that would cost $15 and go beyond the maximum limit of 12.
Since the graph does not provide a reasonable scale to represent the costs based on the number of hours walked (as costs quickly exceed the maximum y-value of 12), we conclude that the provided graph is not suitable for this situation.
So, the answer is **2** (no).