Question
                a_100 = 2 × a_100-1
Write an exponential function to represent your geometric sequence. Show that
it has the same structure as your explicit formula
            
        Write an exponential function to represent your geometric sequence. Show that
it has the same structure as your explicit formula
Answers
                                                    There are no human answers yet.
                                            
                
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    To represent your geometric sequence using an exponential function, we need to recognize the pattern and the common ratio in the sequence. You have provided a recurrence relation for the sequence:
\[
a_n = 2 \times a_{n-1}
\]
This indicates that each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by 2. The initial term \( a_1 \) will be the starting point of the sequence.
Let's express the first few terms of the sequence to understand the pattern:
- Assume \( a_1 = a \) (this is the first term).
- Then, \( a_2 = 2 \times a_1 = 2a \)
- Next, \( a_3 = 2 \times a_2 = 2 \times (2a) = 4a \)
- And \( a_4 = 2 \times a_3 = 2 \times (4a) = 8a \)
From this, we can generalize the sequence:
\[
a_n = 2^{n-1} \times a_1
\]
If we assume \( a_1 = a \), we can rewrite this as:
\[
a_n = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
This is the explicit formula for your geometric sequence where \( a \) is the first term and 2 is the common ratio.
Now, to connect this to the exponential function:
The exponential function can be represented in the same structure as:
\[
f(n) = a \cdot r^{n-1}
\]
where \( r \) is the common ratio. In your case, this translates to:
\[
f(n) = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
Thus, this matches with the explicit formula we derived. We can see that both forms have the same structure. You have an initial term multiplied by a constant raised to the power of \( n-1 \), which represents the growth of the sequence in both cases. Therefore, we can conclude that:
\[
a_n = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
is the explicit formula, and it has the same structure as the exponential function representing the geometric sequence.
    
\[
a_n = 2 \times a_{n-1}
\]
This indicates that each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by 2. The initial term \( a_1 \) will be the starting point of the sequence.
Let's express the first few terms of the sequence to understand the pattern:
- Assume \( a_1 = a \) (this is the first term).
- Then, \( a_2 = 2 \times a_1 = 2a \)
- Next, \( a_3 = 2 \times a_2 = 2 \times (2a) = 4a \)
- And \( a_4 = 2 \times a_3 = 2 \times (4a) = 8a \)
From this, we can generalize the sequence:
\[
a_n = 2^{n-1} \times a_1
\]
If we assume \( a_1 = a \), we can rewrite this as:
\[
a_n = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
This is the explicit formula for your geometric sequence where \( a \) is the first term and 2 is the common ratio.
Now, to connect this to the exponential function:
The exponential function can be represented in the same structure as:
\[
f(n) = a \cdot r^{n-1}
\]
where \( r \) is the common ratio. In your case, this translates to:
\[
f(n) = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
Thus, this matches with the explicit formula we derived. We can see that both forms have the same structure. You have an initial term multiplied by a constant raised to the power of \( n-1 \), which represents the growth of the sequence in both cases. Therefore, we can conclude that:
\[
a_n = a \cdot 2^{n-1}
\]
is the explicit formula, and it has the same structure as the exponential function representing the geometric sequence.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.