To determine which graph represents a system of inequalities with no solutions, we need to identify if there are any regions where the inequalities contradict each other, leaving no area where they overlap.
Typically, graphs of systems of inequalities consist of half-planes (the regions above or below lines) defined by linear equations. If two lines are solid, they represent inequalities that include the line (e.g., ≤ or ≥). If the lines are dashed, they represent inequalities that do not include the line (e.g., < or >).
Here’s how to assess the options:
-
A system with two lines that overlap completely but have different inequality directions would leave no possible solutions (e.g., one inequality represents the area above the line while the other represents below the same line).
-
A graph with two non-intersecting lines (one on top of the other) would indicate that any potential solution area is entirely excluded.
From your description, the key is to look for two lines (either solid or dashed) that lead to a contradiction in potential solution areas.
Since I don't have visual access to the graphs, my suggestion would be to:
- Identify a pair of lines (if they are present) where the regions they shade do not overlap at all.
- Also note if there are any situations where the inequalities suggest impossible conditions (for example, one region above a line and another below the same line).
Based on your descriptions, the graph characterized by two solid lines or two dashed lines that contradict each other, possibly appearing parallel or conflicting in shading would be the graph representing a system of inequalities with no solutions.
Evaluate each option carefully based on these principles, focusing on the shading provided by the inequalities and their respective boundaries, as those are crucial in determining solution viability.