Which explicit statement is best supported by the details in the passage?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

The passengers oppose the candidates chosen by the committee.
The passengers oppose the candidates chosen by the committee.

Mr. Rogers speaks to express his dissatisfaction with being chosen by the committee.
Mr. Rogers speaks to express his dissatisfaction with being chosen by the committee.

The passengers are horrified at the thought of resorting to cannibalism.
The passengers are horrified at the thought of resorting to cannibalism.

Mr. Rogers wants another candidate because Mr. Herrman has lost too much weight.
Mr. Rogers wants another candidate because Mr. Herrman has lost too much weight.

Answer 1

To determine which explicit statement is best supported by the details in the passage, we would need to analyze the content of the passage itself.

However, given the options presented, an effective strategy would be to look for the statement that is most directly supported by character actions, dialogue, or strong sentiments expressed in the passage. If Mr. Rogers has openly expressed dissatisfaction or if a discussion reflects on the feelings towards cannibalism, those statements would have stronger backing.

If I had to choose based on typical content analysis without specific passage details, I would lean towards the statement that aligns with the character's direct expression or a strong sentiment shown within the context.

Without the specific content of the passage, I can't definitively answer, but typically the statement about Mr. Rogers expressing dissatisfaction might be the safest pick, depending on common narrative structures in such scenarios.

Ultimately, if you can provide the passage or summarize its core themes, I can make a more accurate judgment about which statement is best supported.