Question
What did Near v. Minnesota decide about prior restraint?(1 point)
Responses
It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials.
It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials.
It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.
It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.
It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.
It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.
It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.
Responses
It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials.
It is allowed when information is reporting on the scandals of public officials.
It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.
It is allowed if malice against a public official can be proven.
It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.
It is unconstitutional unless information is proven to be false.
It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
Near v. Minnesota (1931) established that prior restraint on publication is unconstitutional unless it is related to matters of national security or other compelling interests. Therefore, the correct response is:
**It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.**
**It is unconstitutional unless information is related to matters of national security.**