To decompose a dodecagon (12-sided polygon) into ( n - 2 ) triangles, where ( n ) is the number of sides, we can use the triangulation method.
For a dodecagon, ( n = 12 ), so we need to decompose it into ( 12 - 2 = 10 ) triangles.
From your description, it seems that both figure 1 and figure 2 involve the connections of vertex F to various other vertices, which indicates that they might both be valid approaches to triangulating the dodecagon.
However, without seeing the specific illustrations in figure 1 and figure 2, I can't definitively select between them. Generally, if both figures maintain a proper triangulation by only connecting vertices without crossing lines and result in the correct number of triangles, then either might be correct.
If any of the figures do something like connect vertices in a way that overlaps or creates non-triangular shapes, it needs to be assessed accordingly.
Based on your description, if both figures provide valid connections that yield 10 triangles, then the correct answer would depend on which one you find matches a proper triangulation best.
If you have to select one:
- If both decompose the dodecagon correctly into 10 triangles each without overlap or errors, then you may need additional information or a detailed visual to determine which one to select.
- If only one clearly shows an appropriate triangulation, select that one.
Without further specifics about the figures, you can try to identify if either figure is incorrect in terms of triangulation or configuration. If they both appear to triangulate correctly, choose figure 1 or figure 2 based on which one seems more accurate to your understanding.