Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Are Commercial Honeybees Making Wild Bees Sick?" by Berly McCoy All of the honeybee colonies tested by the researchers were pos...Question
Are commercial honeybees making wild bees sick?: What they found
All of the honeybee colonies tested by the researchers were positive for both viruses, an unfortunate but common occurrence for commercial colonies.
But the number of wild bumblebees carrying viruses varied depending on the proximity to the domesticated hives. There was also variation between the two viruses.
More than 90 percent of bumblebees collected close to apiaries carried black queen cell virus. In sites farther from apiaries, and where no honeybees were foraging, just under 40 percent were positive for this virus. when the researchers checked for actual infections, they found that the proximity to an apiary wasn't telling of whether a bumblebee was infected with black queen cell virus. That means sites near and far from a commercial beehive had the same abundance of black queen cell virus infections.
The connection was clearer for deformed wind virus infections. Twenty percent of bumblebees foraging close to apiaries carried the virus on their outsides and 10 percent had active infections. But in sites more than a half mile away from an apiary, where honeybees were absent, not a single bumblebee tested positive for deformed wing virus - as a carrier or with an infection.
When the researchers looked at infected flowers, they noticed a similar trend. Of the 20 percent of flowers that tested positive for viruses, all were picked close to apiaries. And the denser the flower patch in these areas, the higher the rate of deformed wing virust infection in bumblebees.
Researchers claimed they found a relationship between bumblebee infections and how close the bumblebees were to honeybee apiaries.
Question
What evidence from the text supports the analysis in the last sentence of the article excerpt?(1 point)
Responses
the percentage of flowers that tested positive for viruses and their proximity to apiaries
the percentage of flowers that tested positive for viruses and their proximity to apiaries
the fact that there was a difference between the two types of viruses researchers tested
the fact that there was a difference between the two types of viruses researchers tested
the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries
the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries
the fact that all the honeybee apiaries researchers tested were infected with both viruses
All of the honeybee colonies tested by the researchers were positive for both viruses, an unfortunate but common occurrence for commercial colonies.
But the number of wild bumblebees carrying viruses varied depending on the proximity to the domesticated hives. There was also variation between the two viruses.
More than 90 percent of bumblebees collected close to apiaries carried black queen cell virus. In sites farther from apiaries, and where no honeybees were foraging, just under 40 percent were positive for this virus. when the researchers checked for actual infections, they found that the proximity to an apiary wasn't telling of whether a bumblebee was infected with black queen cell virus. That means sites near and far from a commercial beehive had the same abundance of black queen cell virus infections.
The connection was clearer for deformed wind virus infections. Twenty percent of bumblebees foraging close to apiaries carried the virus on their outsides and 10 percent had active infections. But in sites more than a half mile away from an apiary, where honeybees were absent, not a single bumblebee tested positive for deformed wing virus - as a carrier or with an infection.
When the researchers looked at infected flowers, they noticed a similar trend. Of the 20 percent of flowers that tested positive for viruses, all were picked close to apiaries. And the denser the flower patch in these areas, the higher the rate of deformed wing virust infection in bumblebees.
Researchers claimed they found a relationship between bumblebee infections and how close the bumblebees were to honeybee apiaries.
Question
What evidence from the text supports the analysis in the last sentence of the article excerpt?(1 point)
Responses
the percentage of flowers that tested positive for viruses and their proximity to apiaries
the percentage of flowers that tested positive for viruses and their proximity to apiaries
the fact that there was a difference between the two types of viruses researchers tested
the fact that there was a difference between the two types of viruses researchers tested
the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries
the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries
the fact that all the honeybee apiaries researchers tested were infected with both viruses
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The evidence from the text that supports the analysis in the last sentence of the article excerpt is:
**the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries.**
This is because the findings clearly show a correlation between the location of bumblebees in relation to honeybee apiaries and the presence of viral infections, particularly with deformed wing virus, which had higher infection rates in bumblebees foraging close to apiaries compared to those further away.
**the percentage of bumblebees infected based on their proximity to apiaries.**
This is because the findings clearly show a correlation between the location of bumblebees in relation to honeybee apiaries and the presence of viral infections, particularly with deformed wing virus, which had higher infection rates in bumblebees foraging close to apiaries compared to those further away.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.