The inclusion of the elastic clause in the Constitution was essential for allowing Congress to adapt to changing circumstances and emerging needs of the nation. Without this provision, the federal government could face significant limitations in its ability to pass necessary legislation, leading to an inflexible government unable to respond to new challenges, such as technological advancements or economic crises. For instance, the ability of Congress to create laws regarding internet regulation would be hindered without the elastic clause, as such an issue did not exist when the Constitution was originally written. Thus, the Framers were right to include the elastic clause, as it ensures that the government can remain effective and relevant over time.
What problems might have arisen if the elastic clause hadn't been put in the Constitution? Do you think the Framers were right to include the elastic clause?
Your answer should be 3-5 sentences long. It must have a thesis statement, a piece of evidence that backs up your claim, and reasoning explaining why your evidence supports your claim.
(4 points)
Bot GPT 4-o mini
answered
9 days ago
9 days ago