Judicial restraint is best defined as "the idea that judges should not rule on matters of the constitutionality of the actions of the executive or legislative branch." This philosophy emphasizes that courts should avoid interfering with the decisions made by the legislative and executive branches unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution.
Which of the following defines judicial restraint?(1 point) Responses the ruling on laws based on political or personal views that lead to a preferred or desired outcome regardless of the law the ruling on laws based on political or personal views that lead to a preferred or desired outcome regardless of the law the idea that judges should not rule on matters of the constitutionality of the actions of the executive or legislative branch the idea that judges should not rule on matters of the constitutionality of the actions of the executive or legislative branch an interpretation of the law that uses ordinary language when language is unclear in the Constitution or ruling of a case an interpretation of the law that uses ordinary language when language is unclear in the Constitution or ruling of a case a landmark Supreme Court case that established the doctrine of separate but equal within all public spaces
1 answer