Question
                Question
What is the irrational cube root 40−−√3
rewritten as a product of an integer and another irrational cube root?(1 point)
Responses
−25–√3
negative 2 root index 3 start root 5 end root
25–√3
2 root index 3 start root 5 end root
210−−√3
2 root index 3 start root 10 end root
85–√3
            
        What is the irrational cube root 40−−√3
rewritten as a product of an integer and another irrational cube root?(1 point)
Responses
−25–√3
negative 2 root index 3 start root 5 end root
25–√3
2 root index 3 start root 5 end root
210−−√3
2 root index 3 start root 10 end root
85–√3
Answers
                    Answer
            
    Thats not one of the answers
    
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    To rewrite \( 40\sqrt[3]{3} \) as a product of an integer and another irrational cube root, we first need to factor \( 40 \) in a way that separates an integer and the remaining part under the cube root.
The number \( 40 \) can be factored as:
\[
40 = 8 \times 5
\]
Now, we know that \( 8 \) is a perfect cube (since \( 8 = 2^3 \)). Thus, we can rewrite:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = (8)\sqrt[3]{5}\sqrt[3]{3}
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
= 2^3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15}
\]
\[
= 2\sqrt[3]{8 \cdot 5 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{120}
\]
However, we want it in a more suitable form. Since \( 40 = 8 \cdot 5 \), we can rewrite:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = 2\sqrt[3]{8} \cdot \sqrt[3]{5} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} = 2 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{15} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3}
\]
Thus, your expression is presented as:
\[
= 2\sqrt[3]{40}
\]
Thus, writing it as the form requested we can say:
**The closest option to the derived answer is:**
- \( 2\sqrt[3]{15} \)
However, it's not in your option, since let's review the options presented:
1. \( -25\sqrt[3]{3} \)
2. \( 2\sqrt[3]{5} \)
3. \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \)
4. \( 85\sqrt[3]{3} \)
Since none perfectly match \( \sqrt[3]{5} \) we are presented closest to \( 2\sqrt[3]{40} \).
So we take the best fitting which would be:
\[
2\sqrt[3]{15}
\]
If we take the view of forms generally the response seems like \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \), in this analytical frame remains to reason what would specifically return on insights of \( 2\sqrt[3]{3} \).
    
The number \( 40 \) can be factored as:
\[
40 = 8 \times 5
\]
Now, we know that \( 8 \) is a perfect cube (since \( 8 = 2^3 \)). Thus, we can rewrite:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = (8)\sqrt[3]{5}\sqrt[3]{3}
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
= 2^3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15}
\]
\[
= 2\sqrt[3]{8 \cdot 5 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{120}
\]
However, we want it in a more suitable form. Since \( 40 = 8 \cdot 5 \), we can rewrite:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = 2\sqrt[3]{8} \cdot \sqrt[3]{5} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} = 2 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15 \cdot 3} = 2\sqrt[3]{15} \cdot \sqrt[3]{3}
\]
Thus, your expression is presented as:
\[
= 2\sqrt[3]{40}
\]
Thus, writing it as the form requested we can say:
**The closest option to the derived answer is:**
- \( 2\sqrt[3]{15} \)
However, it's not in your option, since let's review the options presented:
1. \( -25\sqrt[3]{3} \)
2. \( 2\sqrt[3]{5} \)
3. \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \)
4. \( 85\sqrt[3]{3} \)
Since none perfectly match \( \sqrt[3]{5} \) we are presented closest to \( 2\sqrt[3]{40} \).
So we take the best fitting which would be:
\[
2\sqrt[3]{15}
\]
If we take the view of forms generally the response seems like \( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \), in this analytical frame remains to reason what would specifically return on insights of \( 2\sqrt[3]{3} \).
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. Let's correctly rewrite \( 40\sqrt[3]{3} \) as a product of an integer and another irrational cube root, and then check against the answer choices provided.
To do this:
1. Factor \( 40 \) into \( 8 \times 5 \), where \( 8 \) is a perfect cube.
2. We can express \( 40\sqrt[3]{3} \) as:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = 8 \cdot 5 \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} = 8 \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} \cdot 5 = 8\sqrt[3]{3} \times \sqrt[3]{5}
\]
\[
= 2^3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15}
\]
\[
= 2 \cdot \sqrt[3]{40} \text{ (to form a general form of integer times cube root)}
\]
Next, we want this in the form of \( k \sqrt[3]{m} \).
So now looking at the provided answers:
1. \(-25\sqrt[3]{3}\)
2. \(2\sqrt[3]{5}\)
3. \(2\sqrt[3]{10}\)
4. \(85\sqrt[3]{3}\)
We can see that the form \( 2\sqrt[3]{5} \) closely aligns with the structure while retaining the value scrutiny for rational numbers.
So if \(40 = 8 \cdot 5\) it can become \(2\sqrt[3]{40}\) but does advise closer to an after-simplification. Contemplating remains that:
### The right option is:
**\( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \)**.
Please review these associations suggesting \( k\sqrt[3]{m}\) appropriately to the original query, and my sincere apologies for earlier inaccuracies!
    
To do this:
1. Factor \( 40 \) into \( 8 \times 5 \), where \( 8 \) is a perfect cube.
2. We can express \( 40\sqrt[3]{3} \) as:
\[
40\sqrt[3]{3} = 8 \cdot 5 \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} = 8 \cdot \sqrt[3]{3} \cdot 5 = 8\sqrt[3]{3} \times \sqrt[3]{5}
\]
\[
= 2^3 \cdot \sqrt[3]{15}
\]
\[
= 2 \cdot \sqrt[3]{40} \text{ (to form a general form of integer times cube root)}
\]
Next, we want this in the form of \( k \sqrt[3]{m} \).
So now looking at the provided answers:
1. \(-25\sqrt[3]{3}\)
2. \(2\sqrt[3]{5}\)
3. \(2\sqrt[3]{10}\)
4. \(85\sqrt[3]{3}\)
We can see that the form \( 2\sqrt[3]{5} \) closely aligns with the structure while retaining the value scrutiny for rational numbers.
So if \(40 = 8 \cdot 5\) it can become \(2\sqrt[3]{40}\) but does advise closer to an after-simplification. Contemplating remains that:
### The right option is:
**\( 2\sqrt[3]{10} \)**.
Please review these associations suggesting \( k\sqrt[3]{m}\) appropriately to the original query, and my sincere apologies for earlier inaccuracies!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.