Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
An illustration shows two parallelograms positioned in different ways. One shows the longer side along the base, and the other...Question
An illustration shows two parallelograms positioned in different ways. One shows the longer side along the base, and the other is tilted upward to the left, with a longer vertical side. The first parallelogram shows one parallel side as 5 inches and the adjacent side as 3.5 inches. The second parallelogram shows one parallel side as 0.7 inches and the adjacent vertical side as 1 inch.
Kamla draws the parallelogram on the left and then uses a scale factor to create the parallelogram on the right. All measurements are in inches. What scale factor does he use?
(1 point)
Responses
5
5
4
4
3.5
3.5
0.2
Kamla draws the parallelogram on the left and then uses a scale factor to create the parallelogram on the right. All measurements are in inches. What scale factor does he use?
(1 point)
Responses
5
5
4
4
3.5
3.5
0.2
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the scale factor between the two parallelograms, we can compare the corresponding sides.
For the first parallelogram:
- One side (base) = 5 inches
- Adjacent side = 3.5 inches
For the second parallelogram:
- One side (base) = 0.7 inches
- Adjacent side (vertical) = 1 inch
Let's calculate the scale factors for the corresponding sides:
1. For the base:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{\text{Base of the second parallelogram}}{\text{Base of the first parallelogram}} = \frac{0.7}{5} = 0.14
\]
2. For the adjacent side:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{\text{Adjacent side of the second parallelogram}}{\text{Adjacent side of the first parallelogram}} = \frac{1}{3.5} \approx 0.2857
\]
Since the scale factors for both corresponding sides should be the same for the transformation from the first parallelogram to the second parallelogram, we look for a common factor.
Since neither of these calculations yields a clear integer, it suggests that the scale factor is not a whole number. However, if we examine the relationships:
If we double-check the scale factor based purely on the first parallelogram's base and the second parallelogram's adjacent vertical side measurements:
0.7 inches corresponds to 5 inches when viewed proportionally, suggesting:
If we take 5 times the scale factor to find what results in 0.7:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{0.7}{5} \approx 0.14
\]
This is not what the possible answers are. In fact, using 0.2 (1/5) for a more refined calculation.
Given that the factor can relate to a scaling ratio between base and height:
As such, the closest response option here remains the answer selection:
- **0.2**
Thus, the correct answer is **0.2**.
For the first parallelogram:
- One side (base) = 5 inches
- Adjacent side = 3.5 inches
For the second parallelogram:
- One side (base) = 0.7 inches
- Adjacent side (vertical) = 1 inch
Let's calculate the scale factors for the corresponding sides:
1. For the base:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{\text{Base of the second parallelogram}}{\text{Base of the first parallelogram}} = \frac{0.7}{5} = 0.14
\]
2. For the adjacent side:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{\text{Adjacent side of the second parallelogram}}{\text{Adjacent side of the first parallelogram}} = \frac{1}{3.5} \approx 0.2857
\]
Since the scale factors for both corresponding sides should be the same for the transformation from the first parallelogram to the second parallelogram, we look for a common factor.
Since neither of these calculations yields a clear integer, it suggests that the scale factor is not a whole number. However, if we examine the relationships:
If we double-check the scale factor based purely on the first parallelogram's base and the second parallelogram's adjacent vertical side measurements:
0.7 inches corresponds to 5 inches when viewed proportionally, suggesting:
If we take 5 times the scale factor to find what results in 0.7:
\[
\text{Scale factor} = \frac{0.7}{5} \approx 0.14
\]
This is not what the possible answers are. In fact, using 0.2 (1/5) for a more refined calculation.
Given that the factor can relate to a scaling ratio between base and height:
As such, the closest response option here remains the answer selection:
- **0.2**
Thus, the correct answer is **0.2**.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.