Question
In the case of
, a Memphis Police officer shot and killed a suspect climbing over a fence after stealing $10 from a residence. The Tennessee
statute at the time had allowed officers to use deadly force against fleeing suspects but this statute was ruled unconstitutional. In addition, the Supreme Court stated that a police officer cannot use deadly force when the suspect is fleeing and is of no immediate threat to the officer or others.
0 a
• b
O d
Graham vs. Conner (1989)
Tennessee vs. Garner (1985)
Mapp vs. Ohio (1961)
Miranda vs. Arizona (1966)
, a Memphis Police officer shot and killed a suspect climbing over a fence after stealing $10 from a residence. The Tennessee
statute at the time had allowed officers to use deadly force against fleeing suspects but this statute was ruled unconstitutional. In addition, the Supreme Court stated that a police officer cannot use deadly force when the suspect is fleeing and is of no immediate threat to the officer or others.
0 a
• b
O d
Graham vs. Conner (1989)
Tennessee vs. Garner (1985)
Mapp vs. Ohio (1961)
Miranda vs. Arizona (1966)
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The case you are referring to is **Tennessee v. Garner (1985)**. This landmark Supreme Court decision ruled that the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect is unconstitutional when the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer or others.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.