Alex was observing a specimen using a microscope. They observed multiple cells in rows that resembled bricks or boxes. They also noticed a nucleus in the middle of each cell, and the cells contained small organelles that were green in color. Alex concluded they were looking at plant cells. What evidence from their observations best supports this claim?(1 point)Responses There were multiple cells. There were multiple cells. The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts. The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts. Each cell had a nucleus. Each cell had a nucleus. The cells contained organelles. The cells contained organelles.

Question

Alex was observing a specimen using a microscope. They observed multiple cells in rows that resembled bricks or boxes. They also noticed a nucleus in the middle of each cell, and the cells contained small organelles that were green in color. Alex concluded they were looking at plant cells. What evidence from their observations best supports this claim?(1 point)Responses There were multiple cells. There were multiple cells. The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts. The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts. Each cell had a nucleus. Each cell had a nucleus. The cells contained organelles. The cells contained organelles.

👇

1 answer
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
8 days ago

The evidence from their observations that best supports the claim that Alex was looking at plant cells is: The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts.

This is because plant cells are characterized by the presence of a rigid cell wall and chloroplasts (which are green due to chlorophyll), indicating they are capable of photosynthesis.

The evidence from their observations that best supports the claim that Alex was looking at plant cells is: **The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts.**

The evidence from their observations that best supports the claim that Alex was looking at plant cells is: The cells had a cell wall and chloroplasts.