Which expression is equivalent to 60(14x−2)+20(34y−4) (1 point)Responses30xy−20030 x y minus 20015x+15y−6415 x plus 15 y minus 6415x−15y−20015 x minus 15 y minus 20015x+15y−200

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
4 days ago

To simplify the expression \(60(14x - 2) + 20(34y - 4)\), we will distribute the constants:

1. Distributing \(60\) in the first term:
\[
60(14x - 2) = 60 \cdot 14x - 60 \cdot 2 = 840x - 120
\]

2. Distributing \(20\) in the second term:
\[
20(34y - 4) = 20 \cdot 34y - 20 \cdot 4 = 680y - 80
\]

3. Now combine the two results:
\[
840x - 120 + 680y - 80
\]

4. Combine the constant terms:
\[
-120 - 80 = -200
\]

Hence, we can write the entire expression as:
\[
840x + 680y - 200
\]

Looking at the options provided:
- **None of these options match exactly, but we can factor the expression.**

We notice:
- \(840\) can be factored including \(60\) (specifically as \(60 \cdot 14\)).
- \(680\) can similarly be written as \(20 \cdot 34\).

However, grouping based on the sums of coefficients doesn't clearly yield the choices given.

The correct expression rearranged for choice representation should be:
\[
60(14x) + 20(34y) - 200
\]
Which means none of the choices given matches correctly.

Considering what fits best in the absence of more valid options based on standard polynomial factoring or distribution principles would be \(15x + 15y - 200\), recognizing that there seems to be a miscalculation in coefficient analysis.

The final answer seems to best approach:
Based on available options, likely \(15x + 15y - 200\) should be noted even if verification for factoring reveals limitations.

Each alternative shows complexities or discrepancies beyond simple misalignment in initial configurations, and you may need to consider reconciling or validating each coefficient to ensure fidelity with structural representation based on original algebraic terms resolved.

Thus the best option given the constraints would be:
**15x + 15y - 200**.