Freda is facing conflicting advice from her friends regarding her vacation plans.
-
Henry advises her to postpone her trip based on a documentary about a past hurricane that made landfall around the same date she plans to arrive. His argument is based on historical events, which might not be applicable to current conditions.
-
Ian, on the other hand, is optimistic and tells her to go ahead with her plans, referencing the Farmer’s Almanac, which claims that this year's hurricane season won't be particularly dangerous. His advice is based on a predictive tool but may lack specificity about the current situation.
-
Julia suggests postponing the trip as well, citing the local 3-day weather forecast, which predicts that a hurricane will make landfall on the same day Freda is set to arrive. This is a strong indicator to consider since it's based on recent meteorological data.
-
Kelsey encourages Freda to proceed with her plans, noting that scientists had predicted a hurricane would lose energy before making landfall. However, this information is somewhat outdated and may not reflect the current situation accurately.
In terms of reliability, Julia's advice is the most relevant and actionable since it is based on immediate weather predictions. If the forecast indicates a hurricane is expected to hit the area on the day of her arrival, postponing the trip might be the safest course of action.