Asked by I r
Which of the following is true of a parliamentary system of government, but not of a presidential system
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
In a parliamentary system of government, one key characteristic that distinguishes it from a presidential system is the fusion of powers between the legislative and executive branches. Here are some specifics:
1. **Executive Leadership**: In a parliamentary system, the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy from, and is directly accountable to, the legislature (parliament); the head of government (usually the prime minister) is typically a member of the parliament and is chosen by fellow members. In contrast, in a presidential system, the president is elected independently of the legislature and does not need to be a member of it.
2. **Vote of No Confidence**: Parliamentary systems often allow the legislature to remove the executive through a vote of no confidence. If the prime minister loses this vote, they may have to resign, which can lead to the formation of a new government or the calling of new elections. Presidential systems do not have an equivalent mechanism, making it more difficult to remove a sitting president without going through an impeachment process.
3. **Cabinet Selection**: In a parliamentary system, the prime minister typically selects cabinet members from the parliament, thereby ensuring that the executive is closely linked to the legislative body. In a presidential system, the president appoints cabinet members who may or may not be part of the legislative body, creating a clearer separation between the two branches.
4. **Legislative Control**: In parliamentary systems, the government (executive branch) often has significant control over the legislative agenda and can pass legislation more easily if it commands a majority in parliament. In contrast, in presidential systems, the president may face challenges from a potentially opposing legislature, leading to a stalemate.
These distinctions illustrate how the structure and functioning of a parliamentary system set it apart from a presidential system.
1. **Executive Leadership**: In a parliamentary system, the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy from, and is directly accountable to, the legislature (parliament); the head of government (usually the prime minister) is typically a member of the parliament and is chosen by fellow members. In contrast, in a presidential system, the president is elected independently of the legislature and does not need to be a member of it.
2. **Vote of No Confidence**: Parliamentary systems often allow the legislature to remove the executive through a vote of no confidence. If the prime minister loses this vote, they may have to resign, which can lead to the formation of a new government or the calling of new elections. Presidential systems do not have an equivalent mechanism, making it more difficult to remove a sitting president without going through an impeachment process.
3. **Cabinet Selection**: In a parliamentary system, the prime minister typically selects cabinet members from the parliament, thereby ensuring that the executive is closely linked to the legislative body. In a presidential system, the president appoints cabinet members who may or may not be part of the legislative body, creating a clearer separation between the two branches.
4. **Legislative Control**: In parliamentary systems, the government (executive branch) often has significant control over the legislative agenda and can pass legislation more easily if it commands a majority in parliament. In contrast, in presidential systems, the president may face challenges from a potentially opposing legislature, leading to a stalemate.
These distinctions illustrate how the structure and functioning of a parliamentary system set it apart from a presidential system.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.