To find the most correct representation of the original equation rewritten as two equations joined by "and," we first simplify and analyze:
-
Original equation:
-
By rearranging, we can directly say:
-
We could also imply that there should be a value where is not equal to some constant if a domain is given.
None of the given options are directly representing this setup clearly, but considering logic, it’s likely about defining for some specific integer.
Now, from the provided responses, let's briefly analyze them:
-
and : Incorrect, cause the first part isn't the correct arrangement.
-
and : Not matching since the condition for is wrong.
-
and : Same as above, incorrect.
-
and : Indeterminable for basic algebra without a defined context.
Looking at these options, none correctly convey , nor accurately depict mathematical logic.
Given the situation, it appears the goal is likely the simplest form and a constraint, thus cite the following as the best fit despite it not fitting perfectly:
- Responses can imply So: and potentially matches closest if constraints are assumed matching problematic outputs.
In terms of alignment and clarity based on mathematical correctness given the algebra, none of the four provided options truly satisfy. You may either refer back to the original context you started or seek clarification on whether other exclusions might yield a clearer point of discussion among them.