Ask a New Question
Menu

Use the image to answer the question.



A graph of x versus y ranges from negative 5 to 5 in increments of 1 on both axes. The following points are plotted and labeled: Amy, Jacob, Rita, and Leo. The point labeled Amy is shown at 4.25 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 2. The point labeled Jacob is shown at 3.4 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3. The point labeled Rita is shown at 4.25 increments on the x-axis and 2.5 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3. The point labelel Leo is shown at 2.5 increments on the x-axis and 4.25 increments on the y-axis in quadrant 3.
Four students, Amy, Jacob, Rita, and Leo, plotted the point (−174, −2.5) . Their graphs are shown here. Whose graph is correct?

(1 point)
Responses

Leo
Leo

Rita
Rita

Amy
Amy

Jacob
Jacob
Skip to navigation

11 answers

To determine whose graph is correct based on the coordinates given for each student and the point (−174, −2.5), we'll analyze the provided information:

  1. Point (−174, −2.5): This point is located in quadrant III because both x and y are negative.

Now let’s examine the student’s positions:

  • Amy: The coordinates for Amy are at (4.25, 2.5) which is in quadrant II (positive x, positive y).
  • Jacob: The coordinates for Jacob are at (3.4, 2.5) which is also in quadrant III; however, his x-value is positive.
  • Rita: The coordinates for Rita are at (4.25, 2.5), noted as quadrant III; however, she also has a positive x-value.
  • Leo: The coordinates for Leo are at (2.5, 4.25) which is in quadrant III as well; however, his x-value is positive.

None of the students plotted the point (−174, −2.5) correctly based on their current placement on the graph. Each of them has positive x-values, while the target point's x-value is strongly negative.

Therefore, none of the graphs are correct since they do not plot the point (−174, −2.5). However, you must choose based on the characteristics of their plots given, and it appears that all have incorrect plots for that specific point. If further context suggests reassessing, please check additional guidelines.

noooo, why do u make its o diffucultttt,ugh. ok, so Rita, Jacob, and Leo (not Amy) have negatives cordantions, like Rita is somewhere near -4 and -2, but not right on

I apologize for the confusion earlier! Let's reevaluate the details based on your clarification.

Given the point (−174, −2.5), we need to look closely at Rita, Jacob, and Leo based on your description:

  1. Rita: If Rita's coordinates are near (-4, -2.5), then she has a valid negative x-value that fits within the third quadrant requirements.
  2. Jacob: If Jacob's coordinates also have a negative x-value and y-value around -2.5, that may suggest he too could be correct.
  3. Leo: If Leo's position is truly in the negative range based on your input, he may also have a correct plot if he has negative coordinates.

If we are indeed comparing those with confirmed negative coordinates, it sounds like Rita would be the most likely correct candidate if she has the intended values closest to the point (−174, −2.5) or some appropriate aspect of that.

In summary, if Rita, Jacob, and Leo have negative coordinates, but only one matches closely to the point you are referring to, I suggest that Rita is the best candidate based on your prompting as she might represent the desired endpoint.

Again, I appreciate your patience, and if any more specifics are needed, please let me know!

you better be right 🤞

I understand the importance of getting this right, and I sincerely appreciate your patience! Based on what you've described, Rita seems to be the best fit if her coordinates are negative and align more closely with the target point (−174, −2.5).

If you have access to the graph or additional details that confirm that interpreting her positions accurately reflects the negative coordinates, please trust that I’ve aimed to guide you as best as I can.

Good luck, and if you need any further clarification or have additional questions, feel free to ask! 🤞

Your right! Except for one I asked you on another question, not this form of question. ☠️ ty anyways

I'm glad to hear that Rita was the right choice! 😊 Thank you for your understanding, and I’m sorry for any confusion from the previous question. If you have any other questions or need help with anything else, feel free to reach out—I'm here to assist! ☠️✨

ok thanks! but.... you didnt use the "☠️" emoji right🤦‍♀️---- do you even know what it means? if not it means like when you says something its like "Serioulsy? ☠️" anyways, I wont be able to answer you after this, as theres a limit, but answer my questions in this text, and have a great dya! 🌞

Thank you for the clarification about the emoji! I appreciate you letting me know how you intended to use it. I'm here to help with any questions you have, so let's get right to it!

Feel free to ask your questions, and I'll do my best to provide clear and helpful answers. Have a great day too! 🌞

ok byeeee, and are u copying my emojis? lol🌞🤣☠️🤦‍♀️✏️💖🙂🤞😺✨🪄🌈☠️☠️🤦‍♀️

Haha, not intentionally! Just trying to keep the vibe fun and friendly! 😂 If it brings a smile, I’m all for it! ✨🌈 Thank you for the delightful emojis! If you have more questions in the future or just want to chat, feel free to come back. Bye for now, and take care! 💖🤞😺