To complete the proof, let's analyze the statements provided and determine what the missing reason should be:
- Statement 1: \( x \parallel y \) (given)
- Statement 2: \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 3\) (definition of vertical angles)
- Statement 3: \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 6\) (definition of corresponding angles)
- Statement 4: \(\angle 3 \cong \angle 6\) (missing reason)
In order to correctly conclude that \(\angle 3 \cong \angle 6\), we can see that this follows from the Transitive Property of Congruence. According to the Transitive Property, if \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 3\) and \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 6\), then it can be concluded that \(\angle 3 \cong \angle 6\).
So, the appropriate missing reason for Statement 4 is:
Reason: Transitive Property of Congruence.
Thus, the completed proof will look like this:
Statement
- \( x \parallel y \)
- \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 3\)
- \(\angle 2 \cong \angle 6\)
- \(\angle 3 \cong \angle 6\)
Reason
- Given
- Definition of vertical angles
- Definition of corresponding angles
- Transitive Property of Congruence.