Zoya's mistake in comparing the growth rates of \( g(x) = 20x \) and \( f(x) = 2^x \) is that they are only comparing the values of each sequence at specific terms without considering the nature of exponential growth versus linear growth.
The correct response is:
Zoya should have made a bigger table. If they did, they would have seen that the terms of \( f(x) = 2^x \) are eventually greater than the terms of \( g(x) = 20x \).
This is because \( f(x) = 2^x \) grows exponentially, while \( g(x) = 20x \) grows linearly. In the long run, the exponential function will outgrow the linear function.