Question
                What presidential power under the Constitution led the Antifederalists to urge for a Bill of Rights?
answers:
veto power over acts of Congress
the power to carry out the laws passed by Congress
the power to declare states of emergency without consulting Congress
military power, as commander-in-chief
            
        answers:
veto power over acts of Congress
the power to carry out the laws passed by Congress
the power to declare states of emergency without consulting Congress
military power, as commander-in-chief
Answers
                    Answer
            
    you sure
    
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    The presidential power under the Constitution that led the Antifederalists to urge for a Bill of Rights is **military power, as commander-in-chief**. The Antifederalists were particularly concerned about the potential for abuse of power by a strong central government, especially in terms of military authority and the potential for tyranny. They sought assurances for individual liberties through the addition of a Bill of Rights to protect against such abuses.
    
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    Yes, the concern of the Antifederalists primarily revolved around the possibility of a strong central government, especially regarding the powers of the president as commander-in-chief of the military. They feared that this power could lead to the potential for tyranny and oppression. This worry contributed significantly to the push for a Bill of Rights, which was seen as necessary to safeguard individual liberties and limit government power.
While all the powers listed could raise concerns, the military power specifically highlighted worries about the actual deployment of armed forces and the potential for abuse of authority. Thus, military power, as commander-in-chief, is a key point of contention that spurred demands for a Bill of Rights.
    
While all the powers listed could raise concerns, the military power specifically highlighted worries about the actual deployment of armed forces and the potential for abuse of authority. Thus, military power, as commander-in-chief, is a key point of contention that spurred demands for a Bill of Rights.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.