Question

The Little Mermaid: Evidence that the plaintiff or prosecuting attorney will introduce, including witnesses:

1-2 sentences pls
Answer
can u make it simple and 1 sentence pls!
Answer
make it sound like a middle schooler simpleeeeeeeeee PLS
Answer
Evidence that the defense attorney will introduce, including witnesses:
Answer
who is ursula's witnesses like how ariel has flounder and sebastion
Answer
Jury's verdict: Tell how the jury finds in the civil or criminal case and justify the verdict. How was the burden of proof met or not met?
Answered by GPT-4o mini
In the case of *The Little Mermaid*, the prosecuting attorney may introduce evidence such as testimonies from Ariel’s friends, like Flounder and Sebastian, who witnessed her transformation and the dangers posed by Ursula's magic. Additionally, the attorney could present direct evidence of Ursula's deceptive practices, highlighting the contractual agreement that Ariel unwittingly entered into, which lacked transparency and exploited her trust.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
The prosecuting attorney will likely present testimony from Ariel's friends, like Flounder and Sebastian, who can describe the dangers of Ursula's magic and Ariel's unfair deal.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
The lawyer will bring in Ariel's friends, like Flounder and Sebastian, to talk about how dangerous Ursula was and how Ariel got tricked into a bad deal.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
The defense attorney might bring in witnesses like Ursula, who can explain her side of the story and argue that Ariel knew what she was getting into when she made the deal. They may also present evidence showing that Ariel's choices led to her own problems.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
Ursula’s witnesses could include her loyal henchmen, Flotsam and Jetsam, who could testify about Ariel's actions and intentions, suggesting that Ursula was simply offering a deal that Ariel willingly accepted. Additionally, Ursula could call upon other sea creatures who may have benefited from her magic to demonstrate that her powers can be used for good.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
In this case, the jury finds in favor of Ursula, concluding that Ariel willingly entered into the agreement, understanding the risks involved. The burden of proof was met by demonstrating that Ariel had the capacity to make informed decisions and that she was aware of the consequences of her actions, as supported by testimonies from Flotsam and Jetsam, which suggested Ariel’s impulsiveness led to her predicament.