This question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.

Part A:

What conclusion can be made about John F. Kennedy's opinion about modern–day scientific knowledge?
A.
He believes that the use of modern–day science is the sole key to ensuring global peace.

B.
He believes that scientific knowledge should be applied primarily for the sake of medical research.

C.
He believes that scientific knowledge can result in both great advancements and great destruction.

D.
He believes that the U.S. should focus its scientific knowledge on the development of superior arms.

Multiple Choice Question
Part B:

Which sentence from the text best supports your answer in part A?
A.
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

B.
…that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self–destruction.

C.
For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

D.
Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors.

2 answers

Part A:

C. He believes that scientific knowledge can result in both great advancements and great destruction.

Part B:

B. …that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self–destruction.

In John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address of 1961, how does the repetition of the phrase "Let both sides" contribute to the overall effectiveness of his message?
A.
It highlights Kennedy's personal commitment to resolving international conflicts and strengthens his credibility.
B.
It underscores the need for mutual cooperation and action from both the United States and other nations, thereby emphasizing a balanced approach to global issues.
C.
It distracts from the core message by focusing too much on the specifics of each side's responsibilities.
D.
It creates a rhythmic pattern that makes the speech more memorable but does not significantly impact the message.