To assess the article on globalization, let's consider the criteria you've mentioned: primary vs. secondary sources, validity, reliability, and credibility.
-
What is it? Primary or secondary?
- The article is a secondary source. It summarizes and interprets information about globalization, drawing on historical examples and current trends, rather than presenting original research or firsthand accounts.
-
How can you tell if it is valid?
- Validity refers to whether the information presented in the article accurately reflects reality. In this case, you can assess validity by checking the facts mentioned in the article against other reputable sources. If other scholarly articles or expert analyses corroborate the information, it can be considered valid.
-
How can you tell if it is reliable?
- Reliability involves consistency and dependability of the information. You can tell the article is reliable if it provides citations or references to credible sources, includes data or research from reputable organizations, and presents a balanced view of globalization, acknowledging both its benefits and downsides.
-
How can you tell if it is credible?
- Credibility pertains to the author's expertise and the publication's reputation. To determine this, you can check the author’s qualifications, the organization responsible for publishing the article, and whether the publication is well-respected in academic or industry circles. If the author is an expert in economics or globalization and the article appears in a credible magazine, journal, or news outlet, it adds to its credibility.
These evaluations can help in determining the article's overall trustworthiness for research or general understanding of globalization.