Question
Choose the inequality that matches this situation
Company A charges $312 to power-wash the siding of a house plus $12 for each window. Company B charges $36 per window, and the price includes the siding. How many windows must a house have to make the total cost from Company A be less expensive than Company B?
answers:
312 - 12w > 36w
312 + 12w < 36w
12w + 36w > 312
36w - 12w < 312
Company A charges $312 to power-wash the siding of a house plus $12 for each window. Company B charges $36 per window, and the price includes the siding. How many windows must a house have to make the total cost from Company A be less expensive than Company B?
answers:
312 - 12w > 36w
312 + 12w < 36w
12w + 36w > 312
36w - 12w < 312
Answers
Answer
are you sure
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine the inequality that represents the situation, let's define \( w \) as the number of windows.
1. **Cost of Company A**: The cost is $312 for the siding plus $12 for each window. Therefore, the total cost for Company A can be expressed as:
\[
C_A = 312 + 12w
\]
2. **Cost of Company B**: The cost is $36 for each window, and this price includes the siding. Therefore, the total cost for Company B can be expressed as:
\[
C_B = 36w
\]
We want to find the number of windows \( w \) for which the cost from Company A is less expensive than the cost from Company B. This can be expressed with the inequality:
\[
C_A < C_B
\]
Substituting in the expressions for \( C_A \) and \( C_B \):
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
Now we simplify the inequality:
1. Subtract \( 12w \) from both sides:
\[
312 < 36w - 12w
\]
\[
312 < 24w
\]
2. Rearranging gives:
\[
312 < 24w \quad \text{or} \quad 312 > 24w \quad \text{(reversing the inequality)}
\]
To express it in the form that matches one of the given answers:
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
The correct answer from the choices provided is:
\[
\boxed{312 + 12w < 36w}
\]
1. **Cost of Company A**: The cost is $312 for the siding plus $12 for each window. Therefore, the total cost for Company A can be expressed as:
\[
C_A = 312 + 12w
\]
2. **Cost of Company B**: The cost is $36 for each window, and this price includes the siding. Therefore, the total cost for Company B can be expressed as:
\[
C_B = 36w
\]
We want to find the number of windows \( w \) for which the cost from Company A is less expensive than the cost from Company B. This can be expressed with the inequality:
\[
C_A < C_B
\]
Substituting in the expressions for \( C_A \) and \( C_B \):
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
Now we simplify the inequality:
1. Subtract \( 12w \) from both sides:
\[
312 < 36w - 12w
\]
\[
312 < 24w
\]
2. Rearranging gives:
\[
312 < 24w \quad \text{or} \quad 312 > 24w \quad \text{(reversing the inequality)}
\]
To express it in the form that matches one of the given answers:
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
The correct answer from the choices provided is:
\[
\boxed{312 + 12w < 36w}
\]
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's carefully verify the problem and the derived inequality step-by-step to confirm the right inequality that matches the situation.
### Given Information:
1. **Company A**:
- Charges $312 for power-washing the siding of a house.
- Charges $12 for each window.
- Total cost for Company A:
\[
C_A = 312 + 12w
\]
2. **Company B**:
- Charges $36 per window, which includes siding.
- Total cost for Company B:
\[
C_B = 36w
\]
### We need to find when Company A is **less expensive** than Company B:
This can be expressed as:
\[
C_A < C_B
\]
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
### Simplifying the inequality:
1. Subtract \( 12w \) from both sides:
\[
312 < 36w - 12w
\]
\[
312 < 24w
\]
2. Rearranging gives:
\[
312 < 24w \quad \text{or} \quad 312 > 24w \quad \text{(reversed)}
\]
So indeed, the inequality derived correctly is:
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
### Review of Given Answers:
The available answer that matches this situation is:
\[
\boxed{312 + 12w < 36w}
\]
This is confirmed to be correct. Therefore, my initial answer is accurate. Thank you for prompting the clarification!
### Given Information:
1. **Company A**:
- Charges $312 for power-washing the siding of a house.
- Charges $12 for each window.
- Total cost for Company A:
\[
C_A = 312 + 12w
\]
2. **Company B**:
- Charges $36 per window, which includes siding.
- Total cost for Company B:
\[
C_B = 36w
\]
### We need to find when Company A is **less expensive** than Company B:
This can be expressed as:
\[
C_A < C_B
\]
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
### Simplifying the inequality:
1. Subtract \( 12w \) from both sides:
\[
312 < 36w - 12w
\]
\[
312 < 24w
\]
2. Rearranging gives:
\[
312 < 24w \quad \text{or} \quad 312 > 24w \quad \text{(reversed)}
\]
So indeed, the inequality derived correctly is:
\[
312 + 12w < 36w
\]
### Review of Given Answers:
The available answer that matches this situation is:
\[
\boxed{312 + 12w < 36w}
\]
This is confirmed to be correct. Therefore, my initial answer is accurate. Thank you for prompting the clarification!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.