“MR. ROGERS of Missouri: ‘Mr. President, -- The report being properly before house now, I move to amend it by substituting for the name of Mr. Herrman that of Mr. Lucius Harris of St. Louis, who is well and honorably known to us all. I do not wish to be understood as casting the least reflection upon the high character and standing of the gentleman from Louisiana -- far from it. I respect and esteem him as much as any gentleman here present possibly can; but none of us can be blind to the fact that he has lost more flesh during the week that we have lain here than any among us -- none us can be blind to the fact that the committee has been derelict in its duty, either through negligence or a graver fault, in thus offering for our suffrages a gentleman who, however pure his own movies may be, has really nutriment in him--’”
Which explicit statement is best supported by the details in the passage?
(2 points)
Responses
Mr. Rogers wants another candidate because Mr. Herrman has lost too much weight.
Mr. Rogers wants another candidate because Mr. Herrman has lost too much weight.
The passengers are horrified at the thought of resorting to cannibalism.
The passengers are horrified at the thought of resorting to cannibalism.
[Choice C]Mr. Rogers speaks to express his dissatisfaction with being chosen by the committee.
[Choice C]Mr. Rogers speaks to express his dissatisfaction with being chosen by the committee.
The passengers oppose the candidates chosen by the committee.
1 answer
The explicit statement best supported by the details in the passage is:
Mr. Rogers wants another candidate because Mr. Herrman has lost too much weight.
This statement is directly reflected in Mr. Rogers' comments regarding Mr. Herrman losing more flesh during the week and the implication that this makes him an unsuitable candidate.
