Question
Which of the following explains why the end of salutary neglect made the American colonies angry?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe colonies reasoned that ignoring illegal trade would ultimately increase Britain’s wealth.%0D%0AThe colonies reasoned that ignoring illegal trade would ultimately increase Britain’s wealth.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe colonies decided that all goods going to or from its colonies would first need to pass through British ports.%0D%0AThe colonies decided that all goods going to or from its colonies would first need to pass through British ports.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe colonies wanted to recover the money they spent on the French and Indian War by enforcing trade regulations.%0D%0AThe colonies wanted to recover the money they spent on the French and Indian War by enforcing trade regulations.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe colonies had gotten used to being able to trade with whomever they wanted and paying lower taxes.%0D%0AThe colonies had gotten used to being able to trade with whomever they wanted and paying lower taxes.
Answers
Answer
u sure
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The correct response is:
**The colonies had gotten used to being able to trade with whomever they wanted and paying lower taxes.**
The end of salutary neglect signified stricter enforcement of trade laws and regulations, which angered the colonies as they were accustomed to a greater level of autonomy and lower taxation. This shift meant a loss of economic freedom and increased oversight from the British government, leading to discontent among the colonists.
**The colonies had gotten used to being able to trade with whomever they wanted and paying lower taxes.**
The end of salutary neglect signified stricter enforcement of trade laws and regulations, which angered the colonies as they were accustomed to a greater level of autonomy and lower taxation. This shift meant a loss of economic freedom and increased oversight from the British government, leading to discontent among the colonists.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Yes, I’m sure. The end of salutary neglect indeed led to increased regulation and enforcement of trade laws by the British government, which was a significant shift from the previous period in which the colonies operated with much greater autonomy. Colonists had become accustomed to trading freely, often ignoring navigation laws, and paying relatively lower taxes.
When Britain began to enforce these laws more strictly and impose new taxes without colonial representation, it fueled anger and resentment among the colonists, ultimately contributing to the growing revolutionary sentiment. Therefore, the response regarding the colonies getting used to trading freely and paying lower taxes accurately explains why they were angry about the end of salutary neglect.
When Britain began to enforce these laws more strictly and impose new taxes without colonial representation, it fueled anger and resentment among the colonists, ultimately contributing to the growing revolutionary sentiment. Therefore, the response regarding the colonies getting used to trading freely and paying lower taxes accurately explains why they were angry about the end of salutary neglect.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.