Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Analyze the provisions guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which provision invalidated the “separate but equal doctrine...Question
                Analyze the provisions guaranteed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Which provision invalidated the “separate but equal doctrine” of Plessy v. Ferguson?(1 point)
Responses
Title II: Public Accommodations
Title II: Public Accommodations
Title IV: Public Schools
Title IV: Public Schools
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title III: Public Property
            
        Responses
Title II: Public Accommodations
Title II: Public Accommodations
Title IV: Public Schools
Title IV: Public Schools
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title VI: Government Agencies
Title III: Public Property
Answers
                                                    There are no human answers yet.
                                            
                
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    The provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that invalidated the “separate but equal” doctrine established by Plessy v. Ferguson is **Title II: Public Accommodations**. 
Title II prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin in places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters. This marked a significant step in dismantling segregation and challenging the legal foundation of the separate but equal doctrine, which had allowed for racial segregation under the premise that it was constitutionally permissible as long as facilities were equal. By ensuring that everyone had equal access to public accommodations, Title II effectively challenged and undermined that doctrine.
While other titles of the Civil Rights Act address related issues, Title II is the one most directly associated with the invalidation of the separate but equal ruling in public spaces.
    
Title II prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin in places of public accommodation, such as hotels, restaurants, and theaters. This marked a significant step in dismantling segregation and challenging the legal foundation of the separate but equal doctrine, which had allowed for racial segregation under the premise that it was constitutionally permissible as long as facilities were equal. By ensuring that everyone had equal access to public accommodations, Title II effectively challenged and undermined that doctrine.
While other titles of the Civil Rights Act address related issues, Title II is the one most directly associated with the invalidation of the separate but equal ruling in public spaces.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.