In the essay “Little Things Are Big,” the author employs vivid details and emotional introspection to vividly illustrate the inner conflict experienced by the narrator. This conflict centers around the narrator’s hesitation to offer assistance to a white woman struggling with her children and luggage, underscoring themes of race, prejudice, and self-doubt.
From the outset, the narrator sets the scene during a late-night subway ride, where the atmosphere is intimate yet fraught with tension due to the time and location. The author writes, “It was very late at night on the eve of Memorial Day,” establishing a sense of isolation and vulnerability. This choice of setting creates an immediate feeling of unease, especially for the narrator, who is acutely aware of their identity as a Puerto Rican man.
The narrator’s internal dialogue reveals the depth of their conflict. He questions, “Should I offer my help as the American white man did?” This rhetorical question highlights the admiration for the other man's action while simultaneously showcasing the narrator’s hesitation rooted in fear of prejudice. The choice to add, “who very likely might have preconceived prejudices about Puerto Ricans,” points to the societal biases that inform his self-doubt and apprehension. The narrator does not merely grapple with his own feelings; he also contemplates the potential response of the woman he wishes to help. He ponders her potential reactions, asking, “What would she say?” and speculating whether she would see his offer of help as “too familiar” or even threatening.
The use of specific imagery further enhances the narrator’s conflict. The description of the “long, deserted platform” and “steep, long concrete stairs” accentuates the physical challenges the woman faces while amplifying the narrator’s struggle to navigate his thought process in this oppressive environment. His decision to pass her by, “as if I saw nothing,” represents a moment of internal defeat. The author writes, “Like a rude animal walking on two legs, I just moved on half running by the long subway platform,” driving home how deeply the narrator feels about his inaction. This metaphor starkly contrasts the narrator's cultural upbringing, as he grapples with the “manners that the Puerto Rican passes on from father to son.”
Finally, the resolution of the conflict surfaces when the narrator reflects on his choices: “If you were not that prejudiced, I failed you.” This acknowledgment signifies not only his regret but also a commitment to self-improvement as he resolves, “I am going to offer my help regardless of how the offer is going to be received.” Here, the conflict evolves into a promise of courage and strength, indicating a recognition that his identity should not confine him but rather empower him to act.
In conclusion, the author masterfully illustrates the narrator's internal conflict through detailed observations, emotional introspection, and vivid imagery. The themes of racial prejudice and personal identity play crucial roles in shaping the narrator’s experience, ultimately leading to a resolution that serves as a testament to personal growth and the importance of acts of kindness despite fear of judgment. The story compellingly highlights how societal pressures can inhibit goodwill, and it advocates for overcoming such barriers in the pursuit of understanding and compassion.