Asked by @_@
Judicial activism is best described as the idea that
A. judicial rulings appear to be based on personal opinions or considerations and not the constitution
B. judges should uphold all laws and decisions, unless they go against the constitution
A. judicial rulings appear to be based on personal opinions or considerations and not the constitution
B. judges should uphold all laws and decisions, unless they go against the constitution
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Judicial activism is best described as the idea that **A. judicial rulings appear to be based on personal opinions or considerations and not the constitution**. This term typically refers to instances where judges are said to interpret the law in ways that reflect their own beliefs or values, rather than strictly adhering to established legal precedents or the literal text of the Constitution.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!