Two close friends, Nell and Hamish, are competing against each other in a tournament. They are evenly matched in skill, and it becomes apparent that they will both make it to the final round. However, Hamish is accused of cheating in the semifinals by one of his opponents. Nell has proof that Hamish couldn't have cheated. However, allowing Hamish to be disqualified would make Nell the winner of the tournament by default.

Question

If the story's theme is about good sportsmanship, what would be the most logical conclusion to this story?
(1 point)
a Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.
b Nell reaches out to Regina, the tournament organizer, for help in clearing Hamish's name.
c Nell refuses to speak up in defense of Hamish and wins the tournament.
d Nell does something to get disqualified from the tournament as well.

Answer 1

The most logical conclusion to the story, given the theme of good sportsmanship, would be:

a. Nell exposes the lie and proves that Hamish is innocent, allowing the friends to compete against each other.

This option aligns with the values of fairness, integrity, and camaraderie that are central to good sportsmanship. By defending Hamish and ensuring that he is not wrongfully disqualified, Nell upholds the spirit of competition and their friendship.