Question
A line graph titled 5 Kilometer Run shows time in minutes on the x-axis and distance in kilometers on the y-axis. The graph shows the trend for four participants: Bella, Ruby, Greg, and Paul. The x-axis ranges from 0 to 60 in increments of 10. The y-axis ranges from 0 to 15 in increments of 2.5. A line labeled Bella starts at the origin and passes through plotted point left parenthesis 45 comma 3.5 right parenthesis. A line labeled Ruby starts at the origin and passes through plotted point left parenthesis 40 comma 2.5 right parenthesis. A line labeled Greg starts at the origin and passes through plotted point left parenthesis 45 comma 2.5 right parenthesis. A line labeled Paul starts at the origin and passes through plotted point left parenthesis 25 comma 1 right parenthesis.
Four friends ran a 5K to raise money for their school. The graph shows their rates as a ratio of distance measured in kilometers and time in minutes. Based on the points shown, name the person who ran 212 km in 45 minutes.
(1 point)
Responses
Bella
Bella
Ruby
Ruby
Paul
Paul
Greg
Four friends ran a 5K to raise money for their school. The graph shows their rates as a ratio of distance measured in kilometers and time in minutes. Based on the points shown, name the person who ran 212 km in 45 minutes.
(1 point)
Responses
Bella
Bella
Ruby
Ruby
Paul
Paul
Greg
Answers
GPT-4o mini
To determine who ran 2.12 km in 45 minutes based on the graph, we need to look at the plotted points for each participant:
- Bella: 3.5 km at 45 minutes
- Ruby: 2.5 km at 40 minutes
- Greg: 2.5 km at 45 minutes
- Paul: 1 km at 25 minutes
It appears that none of the participants ran 2.12 km in exactly 45 minutes. However, looking for the one who ran the closest at that time, we should consider:
- Bella ran 3.5 km in 45 minutes.
- Greg ran 2.5 km in 45 minutes.
Neither of these participants matches the 2.12 km. Based only on the points on the graph, none of the names match the criteria of running 2.12 km in 45 minutes. However, the question could perhaps imply a rounding or a miscommunication of the distance.
If we consider the options based solely on the available data:
The one who ran the distance closest to 2.12 km in 45 minutes is Greg at 2.5 km.
Therefore, the most suitable answer based on the graph is:
**Greg**.
- Bella: 3.5 km at 45 minutes
- Ruby: 2.5 km at 40 minutes
- Greg: 2.5 km at 45 minutes
- Paul: 1 km at 25 minutes
It appears that none of the participants ran 2.12 km in exactly 45 minutes. However, looking for the one who ran the closest at that time, we should consider:
- Bella ran 3.5 km in 45 minutes.
- Greg ran 2.5 km in 45 minutes.
Neither of these participants matches the 2.12 km. Based only on the points on the graph, none of the names match the criteria of running 2.12 km in 45 minutes. However, the question could perhaps imply a rounding or a miscommunication of the distance.
If we consider the options based solely on the available data:
The one who ran the distance closest to 2.12 km in 45 minutes is Greg at 2.5 km.
Therefore, the most suitable answer based on the graph is:
**Greg**.