To determine whose inequality is correct, we need to understand the context of their spending for salad ingredients.
Kendra states the inequality as: \[ 2.25x + 2.65y < 10 \] This means that the total cost of the salad ingredients (lettuce and tomatoes) must be less than $10, which is a valid condition since they cannot exceed their budget.
Tom states the inequality as: \[ 2.25x + 2.65y > 10 \] This implies that they would spend more than $10 on the ingredients, which contradicts their budget of $10.
Since Kendra's inequality accurately reflects their budget constraint (total spending must be less than or equal to $10), and Tom's inequality inaccurately suggests they would exceed their budget, we can conclude that Kendra is correct and Tom is incorrect.