tudy Source 1 and Source 2 below and answer the questions that follow:

Based on the information provided, Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 1 for multiple reasons. Here’s a breakdown of the options:

1. **There are no colour photographs included, unlike Source 2.** - While the presence of photographs may indicate a more casual presentation, it is not a definitive measure of scholarly quality.

2. **All of the above.** - This option typically suggests that you can choose this if you believe all other statements are correct.

3. **The author’s full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university.** - This is a strong indicator of scholarly text, as it suggests credibility and authority in the field.

4. **The article was peer-reviewed.** - Peer review is a hallmark of academic publishing and signifies that the work has undergone evaluation by experts in the field.

5. **The language of the article is formal and academic.** - Scholarly texts typically employ formal language and adhere to academic standards.

6. **It is a research article that was published in an accredited scholarly journal.** - Publication in a reputable journal is a key characteristic of scholarly work.

Given these options, the factors that collectively indicate that Source 2 is more scholarly than Source 1 are points 3, 4, 5, and 6. Therefore, if you are to choose one option, it would be:

**All of the above.**

This encompasses all the specific reasons given, highlighting Source 2's scholarly nature compared to Source 1.