Question
Cruz wrote a system of equations with an infinite number of solutions. One of his equations is 6x+3y=9
. What could be his second equation? (Write the equation in slope-intercept form.)
. What could be his second equation? (Write the equation in slope-intercept form.)
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
For a system of equations to have an infinite number of solutions, the two equations must represent the same line. This means that the second equation must be a scalar multiple of the first equation.
Let's start with the first equation:
\[ 6x + 3y = 9. \]
First, we can convert this equation into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b).
1. Subtract \( 6x \) from both sides to isolate the \( y \) term:
\[ 3y = -6x + 9 \]
2. Divide every term by 3:
\[ y = -2x + 3. \]
Now that we have it in slope-intercept form, we can create a second equation that is equivalent to the first by multiplying the entire equation by a non-zero constant. Let's choose a multiplier of \( 2 \):
\[ 2(y) = 2(-2x + 3) \]
Distributing the \( 2 \):
\[ 2y = -4x + 6. \]
Now, rearranging this into slope-intercept form, we can write it as:
\[ 2y = -4x + 6 \]
or by dividing by \( 2 \):
\[ y = -2x + 3. \]
Since this is equivalent to the first equation, you can also multiply it by \( -1 \):
This gives us another form:
\[ 2y + 4x = 6, \]
To provide a different valid form, let's also multiply our original by \( \frac{1}{2} \):
This leads us to:
\[ 3y = \frac{3}{2} - 3x. \]
So, any equation that is a scalar multiple of \( 6x + 3y = 9 \) will be valid. Another example could be something along the lines of:
\[
4y = -8x + 12.
\]
Including multiples such as:
- \( 9x + 6y = 27 \)
- Many such equations yield infinite solutions.
Thus, you may say explicitly:
A possible second equation is:
\[ 6x + 3y = 9. \]
But to be completely clear, a different scalar multiple leading to a newly represented equation could be:
\[
y + 2x = 3.
\]
This will preserve the properties of there being infinitely many solutions.
Let's start with the first equation:
\[ 6x + 3y = 9. \]
First, we can convert this equation into slope-intercept form (y = mx + b).
1. Subtract \( 6x \) from both sides to isolate the \( y \) term:
\[ 3y = -6x + 9 \]
2. Divide every term by 3:
\[ y = -2x + 3. \]
Now that we have it in slope-intercept form, we can create a second equation that is equivalent to the first by multiplying the entire equation by a non-zero constant. Let's choose a multiplier of \( 2 \):
\[ 2(y) = 2(-2x + 3) \]
Distributing the \( 2 \):
\[ 2y = -4x + 6. \]
Now, rearranging this into slope-intercept form, we can write it as:
\[ 2y = -4x + 6 \]
or by dividing by \( 2 \):
\[ y = -2x + 3. \]
Since this is equivalent to the first equation, you can also multiply it by \( -1 \):
This gives us another form:
\[ 2y + 4x = 6, \]
To provide a different valid form, let's also multiply our original by \( \frac{1}{2} \):
This leads us to:
\[ 3y = \frac{3}{2} - 3x. \]
So, any equation that is a scalar multiple of \( 6x + 3y = 9 \) will be valid. Another example could be something along the lines of:
\[
4y = -8x + 12.
\]
Including multiples such as:
- \( 9x + 6y = 27 \)
- Many such equations yield infinite solutions.
Thus, you may say explicitly:
A possible second equation is:
\[ 6x + 3y = 9. \]
But to be completely clear, a different scalar multiple leading to a newly represented equation could be:
\[
y + 2x = 3.
\]
This will preserve the properties of there being infinitely many solutions.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.