Asked by Bornana
A salad dressing recipe requires at least 6 oz of oil to be combined with some combination of vinegar and lemon juice in a 16 oz container.
What inequality models this situation?
Let x represent the number of ounces of vinegar and let y represent the number of ounces of lemon juice.
What inequality models this situation?
Let x represent the number of ounces of vinegar and let y represent the number of ounces of lemon juice.
Answers
Answered by
Bornana
A company prepares a graph of its profit forecast. The annual budget predicts monthly income of at least $5000 more than expenditures.
What inequality models this situation?
Let x represent the expenditures in dollars for a given month and let y represent the income in dollars for the same month.
Express your answer as an inequality in slope-intercept form.
What inequality models this situation?
Let x represent the expenditures in dollars for a given month and let y represent the income in dollars for the same month.
Express your answer as an inequality in slope-intercept form.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To model the salad dressing recipe's requirements, let's summarize the information given:
1. The total volume of the salad dressing (oil, vinegar, and lemon juice combined) should not exceed 16 ounces.
2. There must be at least 6 ounces of oil in the dressing.
Let:
- \( x \) = ounces of vinegar
- \( y \) = ounces of lemon juice
- The amount of oil = 6 ounces
Since we are using a total of 16 ounces for the container, the combined volume of the oil, vinegar, and lemon juice can be represented as follows:
\[
6 + x + y \leq 16
\]
Subtracting 6 from both sides, we can rewrite this inequality as:
\[
x + y \leq 10
\]
Now, since there are no restrictions on how much vinegar and lemon juice can be used individually (except for their combined total), we also have the conditions that both \( x \) and \( y \) should be non-negative:
\[
x \geq 0
\]
\[
y \geq 0
\]
Putting it all together, the inequalities that model this situation are:
1. \( x + y \leq 10 \)
2. \( x \geq 0 \)
3. \( y \geq 0 \)
These inequalities appropriately represent the constraints of the salad dressing recipe involving oil, vinegar, and lemon juice.
1. The total volume of the salad dressing (oil, vinegar, and lemon juice combined) should not exceed 16 ounces.
2. There must be at least 6 ounces of oil in the dressing.
Let:
- \( x \) = ounces of vinegar
- \( y \) = ounces of lemon juice
- The amount of oil = 6 ounces
Since we are using a total of 16 ounces for the container, the combined volume of the oil, vinegar, and lemon juice can be represented as follows:
\[
6 + x + y \leq 16
\]
Subtracting 6 from both sides, we can rewrite this inequality as:
\[
x + y \leq 10
\]
Now, since there are no restrictions on how much vinegar and lemon juice can be used individually (except for their combined total), we also have the conditions that both \( x \) and \( y \) should be non-negative:
\[
x \geq 0
\]
\[
y \geq 0
\]
Putting it all together, the inequalities that model this situation are:
1. \( x + y \leq 10 \)
2. \( x \geq 0 \)
3. \( y \geq 0 \)
These inequalities appropriately represent the constraints of the salad dressing recipe involving oil, vinegar, and lemon juice.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To model the situation where the monthly income is at least $5000 more than the expenditures, we start by defining the variables:
- Let \( x \) represent the expenditures (in dollars).
- Let \( y \) represent the income (in dollars).
The condition states that the income \( y \) is at least $5000 more than the expenditures \( x \). We can express this condition with the following inequality:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
This inequality shows that the income must be greater than or equal to the expenditures plus $5000.
To express this inequality in slope-intercept form, we can rewrite it as:
\[
y - x \geq 5000
\]
This can also be rearranged to match the traditional slope-intercept form \( y = mx + b \), where \( m \) is the slope and \( b \) is the y-intercept. To do this, we simply shift \( x \) to the other side of the inequality:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
In summary, the correct inequality that models the situation in slope-intercept form is:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
This inequality indicates that for any given expenditure \( x \), the income \( y \) must be at least $5000 greater than that expenditure.
- Let \( x \) represent the expenditures (in dollars).
- Let \( y \) represent the income (in dollars).
The condition states that the income \( y \) is at least $5000 more than the expenditures \( x \). We can express this condition with the following inequality:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
This inequality shows that the income must be greater than or equal to the expenditures plus $5000.
To express this inequality in slope-intercept form, we can rewrite it as:
\[
y - x \geq 5000
\]
This can also be rearranged to match the traditional slope-intercept form \( y = mx + b \), where \( m \) is the slope and \( b \) is the y-intercept. To do this, we simply shift \( x \) to the other side of the inequality:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
In summary, the correct inequality that models the situation in slope-intercept form is:
\[
y \geq x + 5000
\]
This inequality indicates that for any given expenditure \( x \), the income \( y \) must be at least $5000 greater than that expenditure.