The logical fallacy used in the text is a hasty generalization. This fallacy occurs when a conclusion is drawn about a whole group based on an inadequate sample size or an isolated example. In this case, the assertion that "millennials are such a lazy generation" is based solely on the situation of one individual, Brennan, rather than on evidence that represents the entire generation.
Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Did you know that Brennan is back home living with his parents again and won't get a job? Gosh, millennials are such a lazy generation.
7 answers
Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Evan argues that American schools should offer foreign language classes at every level. I disagree. How could Evan not see the value of learning English?
Evan argues that American schools should offer foreign language classes at every level. I disagree. How could Evan not see the value of learning English?
The logical fallacy used in the text is a straw man fallacy. In this case, the response to Evan's argument is misrepresenting it by suggesting that he does not see the value of learning English, which may not be true. Instead of addressing Evan's actual point about offering foreign language classes at every level, the argument attacks a distorted version of his position, making it easier to refute.
Which logical fallacy is used in the text?
Don't be deceived by Emily Woodard's articles on rural, blue-collar workers. Her husband is a fancy investment banker, so she can't possibly understand their situation.
Don't be deceived by Emily Woodard's articles on rural, blue-collar workers. Her husband is a fancy investment banker, so she can't possibly understand their situation.
The logical fallacy used in the text is an ad hominem fallacy. This fallacy occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the character or circumstances of the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. In this case, the implication is that Emily Woodard's background and her husband's profession undermine her credibility regarding rural, blue-collar workers, without actually addressing the content of her articles or arguments.
what else can it be
In addition to being an ad hominem fallacy, the text can also be seen as an example of guilt by association. This fallacy occurs when someone discredits another person's argument based on the affiliations or characteristics of someone they associate with. In this case, Emily Woodard's husband's profession as a "fancy investment banker" is used to imply that she is out of touch and therefore unable to understand the issues faced by rural, blue-collar workers.
So, the main fallacy present is ad hominem, but it also embodies elements of guilt by association.