Coevolution can be seen between some plants and animals, like the yucca plant and the yucca moth. The flowers are shaped specifically so that only the tiny moth can pollinate them.

Question

If the yucca moth goes extinct due to climate change or other human-generated factors, what would be the likely outcome for the yucca plant?

(1 point)
Responses

Humans would have to engineer a way to pollinate the plant.
Humans would have to engineer a way to pollinate the plant.

The yucca plant would also go extinct.
The yucca plant would also go extinct.

A new animal would evolve or adapt to take over the job of the yucca moth.
A new animal would evolve or adapt to take over the job of the yucca moth.

The yucca plant would evolve a new way to be pollinated.

Answer 1

The most likely outcome for the yucca plant if the yucca moth goes extinct is:

The yucca plant would also go extinct.

This is because the yucca moth is specifically adapted to pollinate the yucca plant, and without it, the plant would likely struggle to reproduce effectively. While other options suggest potential adaptations or new relationships, those processes would take a significant amount of time and may not succeed, leading to the extinction of the yucca plant in the absence of its primary pollinator.

Answer 2

Scientists often rely on _____ as evidence when looking at an animal’s reproductive success.(1 point)
Responses

reasoning
reasoning

inferences
inferences

conclusions
conclusions

data

Answer 3

Scientists often rely on data as evidence when looking at an animal’s reproductive success. Data can include various quantitative and qualitative measurements regarding birth rates, survival rates of offspring, and other reproductive metrics.

Answer 4

A student is analyzing data that compare the change in the total number of wading bird nests in the Everglades to the change in rainfall. Wading birds feed primarily on fish. Fewer nests were observed in dry years than wet years. What is a reasonable inference about the relationship between wading bird reproductive success and water depth in the Everglades? (1 point) Responses Water depth likely affects wading birds’ access to food and thus affects wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth likely affects wading birds’ access to food and thus affects wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth does not affect wading birds’ access to food but does affect wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth does not affect wading birds’ access to food but does affect wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth likely affects wading birds’ access to food, but this does not affect wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth likely affects wading birds’ access to food, but this does not affect wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth does not affect wading birds’ access to food and thus does not affect wading birds’ reproductive success. Water depth does not affect wading birds’ access to food and thus does not affect wading birds’ reproductive success.

Answer 5

The most reasonable inference about the relationship between wading bird reproductive success and water depth in the Everglades is:

Water depth likely affects wading birds’ access to food and thus affects wading birds’ reproductive success.

This inference is based on the observation that wading birds feed primarily on fish, and changes in water depth may influence the availability of fish, thereby impacting the birds’ ability to feed and successfully raise their young.

Answer 6

What is a difference between how ants and elephants primarily use grouping for survival? (1 point)
Responses

Ants use grouping for better chance of mating, and elephants use grouping for better access to food.
Ants use grouping for better chance of mating, and elephants use grouping for better access to food.

Ants use grouping for cooperation, and elephants use grouping for protection of the young.
Ants use grouping for cooperation, and elephants use grouping for protection of the young.

Elephants use grouping for cooperation, and ants use grouping for protection of the young.
Elephants use grouping for cooperation, and ants use grouping for protection of the young.

Elephants use grouping for better chance of mating, and ants use grouping for better access to food.

Answer 7

The correct response is:

Ants use grouping for cooperation, and elephants use grouping for protection of the young.

Ants often work together in colonies for tasks such as foraging, defending their nest, and caring for their young, demonstrating cooperation among members. In contrast, elephants tend to form herds primarily for the protection of their young as they navigate their environments, which can provide safety in numbers against predators.