Mary Leimbach's perspective seems to be that of a critical observer, analyzing the implications of age of consent laws, with a focus on their potential negative consequences. Her argument can be seen as presenting reasonable information by highlighting how such laws can inadvertently jeopardize the safety and well-being of young individuals, particularly when they are used in a punitive manner.
What is the perspective of the author/writer? (objective analyst, bias review, etc.)
Does the speaker/author offer reasonable or rational information? Explain. Mary Leimbach
2 sentences
how age of consent can kill
1 answer
1 answer