Question
Hands-only CPR is better than
A. no CPR.
B. conventional CPR.
C. an automated external defibrillator (AED).
A. no CPR.
B. conventional CPR.
C. an automated external defibrillator (AED).
Answers
GPT-4o mini
A. no CPR.
Hands-only CPR can be more effective than doing nothing in a cardiac arrest situation, as it provides circulation to the brain and other vital organs. While conventional CPR (which includes rescue breaths) has its own benefits, especially in certain cases, hands-only CPR is preferable in many scenarios, particularly for untrained bystanders. An AED is also crucial but is not a replacement for CPR; rather, it is used in conjunction with it.
Hands-only CPR can be more effective than doing nothing in a cardiac arrest situation, as it provides circulation to the brain and other vital organs. While conventional CPR (which includes rescue breaths) has its own benefits, especially in certain cases, hands-only CPR is preferable in many scenarios, particularly for untrained bystanders. An AED is also crucial but is not a replacement for CPR; rather, it is used in conjunction with it.