Judicial activism is typically warranted by the Supreme Court when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues. This reflects the court's role in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring justice, especially in cases where fundamental rights may be at stake or where there is ambiguity in the law.
When is judicial activism warranted by the Supreme Court? (1 point)
• when there is a need to decide on constitutional issues
• if a case is highly publicized in the media
• in any case that is appealed to it
• if there is a case where the court disagrees with a previous decision of the lower court
1 answer
1 answer