To analyze the statements, we first need to consider the fractions of students that reported finding each type of tree.
- Birch tree:
- Pine tree:
(This fraction is greater than 1, which is impossible in this context; it suggests that at least 9 students reported finding a pine tree while implying more than total students, which makes no sense.) - Maple tree:
- Oak tree:
Since there's an issue with the pine tree fraction, we would need to assume that it is at least 1 (representing a whole student). Therefore, we should interpret these fractions within the context of a common denominator and students.
Let’s use a total number of students, for example, let’s take 28 as a base number of total students (the least common multiple of the denominators 7 and 4 would be 28).
- For the birch tree:
- For the pine tree:
- For the maple tree:
- For the oak tree:
Therefore:
- Birch: 4 students
- Pine: 9 or more students (could assume 9)
- Maple: 7 students
- Oak: Approximately 13 students
Using that context, we can analyze the statements:
-
Over half the students found a pine tree.
False. Assuming at least 9 students (assuming the minimum of 9 based on purely the fractions), that would be (half of 28 is 14), which is not over half. -
More students found a maple tree than a pine tree.
False. If 9 students reported a pine tree, 7 reported a maple tree. Therefore, more students found a pine tree (9) than a maple (7). -
More students found a birch tree than an oak tree.
False. 4 students found birch, while about 13 students found oak. -
More students found a pine tree than a birch tree.
True. With at least 9 reporting pine and 4 reporting birch, more students did indeed find pine trees than birch trees.
Final results for the statements:
- False
- False
- False
- True