The best example to illustrate how perspectives are likely to be different over time is the evolving view of slavery, specifically how artists from different eras addressed this subject through their work.
For instance, consider the paintings of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres in the early 19th century and contemporary artists today. During Ingres's time, slavery was an accepted practice in many societies, and his works, while they might not directly reflect slavery, were created in a context where the exploitation of individuals was normalized. Artists of that era often depicted scenes of luxury and sensuality that could indirectly imply a disconnect from the harsh realities of enslaved peoples.
In contrast, contemporary artists approach the subject of slavery with a critical lens, often focusing on its brutal impact and ongoing legacy. For example, someone like Kara Walker uses her art to highlight the historical trauma of slavery, confronting viewers with the stark realities and inheritance of that history. This difference in perspective is supported by societal changes, as modern movements emphasize human rights and equality, leading to a profound reevaluation of how slavery is understood and discussed.
This example demonstrates a significant cultural shift, wherein the moral and ethical considerations surrounding slavery have evolved dramatically. Today, art serves not just as a reflection of society but as a vehicle for social justice, whereas art in the past often perpetuated existing inequalities or was ambivalent to the suffering caused by such institutions. This shift illustrates how the perspectives of artists and society's values differ markedly across time.