Salem, Oregon and St. Paul, Minnesota are both located at 45° N latitude. Salem is located near the Pacific; St. Paul is landlocked. Which of the following would you expect? (1 point)

Question

Salem, Oregon and St. Paul, Minnesota are both located at 45° N latitude. Salem is located near the Pacific; St. Paul is landlocked. Which of the following would you expect? (1 point)

that St. Paul will be colder in the winter
that St. Paul will be cooler in the summer
that Salem will be colder in the winter
that both will be the same temperature

👇

15 answers
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

You would expect that St. Paul will be colder in the winter.

This is because St. Paul, being landlocked and situated away from the moderating effects of the ocean, tends to experience more extreme temperature variations, leading to colder winter temperatures. In contrast, Salem, being near the Pacific Ocean, benefits from the ocean's moderating influence, which helps to keep winter temperatures milder.

In summer, St. Paul may get warm as well, but the question specifically concerns winter temperatures.

Answer 2

37432 answered
28 days ago

Salem, Oregon and St. Paul, Minnesota are both located at 45° N latitude. Salem is located near the Pacific; St. Paul is landlocked. Which of the following would you expect? (1 point)

that St. Paul will be colder in the winter
that St. Paul will be cooler in the summer
that Salem will be colder in the winter
that both will be the same temperature

Answer 3

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

You would expect that St. Paul will be colder in the winter.

St. Paul, Minnesota, being landlocked and further from the moderating influence of the Pacific Ocean, experiences more extreme winter temperatures compared to Salem, Oregon, which benefits from the ocean's effects that typically result in milder winters. Therefore, St. Paul generally has colder winter temperatures.

Answer 4

37432 answered
28 days ago

Which of the following gives the best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant?

U.S. involvement in the financial support of poorer countries
the gross domestic product of the U.S.
the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America
U.S. involvement in World War I and II

Answer 5

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America.

Throughout the 20th century, U.S. foreign policy often involved interventions in Latin American countries, support for coups, and attempts to influence political outcomes. This has led to feelings of resentment and perceptions of arrogance among many Latin Americans, who see these actions as lacking respect for their sovereignty and self-determination.

Answer 6

37432 answered
28 days ago

Which of the following gives the best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant?

U.S. involvement in the financial support of poorer countries
the gross domestic product of the U.S.
the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America
U.S. involvement in World War I and II

Answer 7

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America.

This perspective is rooted in various historical events, including military interventions, support for authoritarian regimes, and economic policies that have often prioritized U.S. interests over those of Latin American countries. These actions have contributed to a perception that the U.S. acts with a sense of superiority or disregard for the autonomy and needs of Latin American nations.

Answer 8

37432 answered
28 days ago

Many people became much more enthusiastic about living in California in 1848. Why did people's attitudes towards the territory change? (1 point)

There was the possibility of amassing vast fortune in California due to the discovery of gold.
US mappers learned how suitable for life the terrain was in California.
California's war with the United States ended.
California was not widely known to exist in the Eastern United States until 1848.

Answer 9

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

People's attitudes towards California changed in 1848 primarily because there was the possibility of amassing vast fortune in California due to the discovery of gold.

The discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill in January 1848 sparked the California Gold Rush, leading to a massive influx of people seeking wealth and opportunity. This dramatic shift in interest and enthusiasm for California was driven by the allure of gold rather than by changes in mapping, war outcomes, or lack of knowledge about the region.

Answer 10

37432 answered
28 days ago

Why was Amerigo Vespucci important? (1 point)

He was the first European to realize that the earth was about 30,000 km in circumference.
He was the first European to find a route west to Asia.
He realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.
He was the first European to land in the Americas.

Answer 11

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

Amerigo Vespucci was important because he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.

His voyages and subsequent writings helped to establish the understanding that the lands discovered by Columbus and others were part of a separate continent. This realization contributed to the eventual use of the name "America," derived from Vespucci's first name, to refer to the newly discovered continents.

Answer 12

37432 answered
28 days ago

Why was Amerigo Vespucci important? (1 point)

He was the first European to realize that the earth was about 30,000 km in circumference.
He was the first European to find a route west to Asia.
He realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.
He was the first European to land in the Americas.

Answer 13

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

Amerigo Vespucci was important because he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.

His observations during his voyages led to the understanding that the lands encountered by European explorers were part of a distinct continent, separate from Asia. This discovery was significant in the context of the Age of Exploration and contributed to the naming of the continent "America" in his honor.

Answer 14

37432 answered
28 days ago

How did the collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenge older views of the ocean? (1 point)

People used to believe that the earth was smaller than it is.
People used to believe that the Atlantic Ocean bordered Asia.
People used to believe that fisheries would collapse if they were not intensely fished by humans.
People used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible.

Answer 15

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
28 days ago

The collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenged older views of the ocean by demonstrating that people used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible.

Historically, there was a widespread belief that the ocean could provide unlimited resources, leading to overfishing and unsustainable practices. The decline of fish populations has shown that oceans are finite ecosystems that require careful management and conservation to maintain their health and productivity.

Salem, Oregon and St. Paul, Minnesota are both located at 45° N latitude. Salem is located near the Pacific; St. Paul is landlocked. Which of the following would you expect? (1 point)

You would expect that **St. Paul will be colder in the winter**.

Salem, Oregon and St. Paul, Minnesota are both located at 45° N latitude. Salem is located near the Pacific; St. Paul is landlocked. Which of the following would you expect? (1 point)

You would expect **that St. Paul will be colder in the winter**.

Which of the following gives the best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant?

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is **the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America**.

Which of the following gives the best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant?

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is **the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America**.

Many people became much more enthusiastic about living in California in 1848. Why did people's attitudes towards the territory change? (1 point)

People's attitudes towards California changed in 1848 primarily because **there was the possibility of amassing vast fortune in California due to the discovery of gold**.

Why was Amerigo Vespucci important? (1 point)

Amerigo Vespucci was important because **he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether**.

Why was Amerigo Vespucci important? (1 point)

Amerigo Vespucci was important because **he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether**.

How did the collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenge older views of the ocean? (1 point)

The collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenged older views of the ocean by demonstrating that **people used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible**.

You would expect that St. Paul will be colder in the winter.

You would expect that St. Paul will be colder in the winter.

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America.

The best analysis of why many Latin Americans perceive the U.S. as arrogant is the history of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America.

People's attitudes towards California changed in 1848 primarily because there was the possibility of amassing vast fortune in California due to the discovery of gold.

Amerigo Vespucci was important because he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.

Amerigo Vespucci was important because he realized that the Americas were not Asia, but a different landmass altogether.

The collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenged older views of the ocean by demonstrating that people used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible.